Timeline for Is there much difference between Kronecker's and Dedekind's methods in algebraic number theory and commutative algebra?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2010 at 10:08 | history | edited | Leo Alonso | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
edited body
|
| Jun 1, 2010 at 4:01 | comment | added | Gerry Myerson | I suppose it's a typo, but I am quite taken with the phrase, "paper-in-pregress," from the 1st paragraph of this answer. | |
| Jun 1, 2010 at 3:53 | comment | added | Victor Protsak | "Number theory" by Borevich and Shafarevich develops a notion of a "(commutative) ring with divisor theory". I confess that it had felt so obscure that I never made much headway with it, which I now regret. | |
| May 31, 2010 at 11:55 | comment | added | Jeremy Shipley | Gray's "Algebraic Geometry Between Noether and Noether" is another good reference. | |
| May 31, 2010 at 11:09 | history | answered | Leo Alonso | CC BY-SA 2.5 |