Skip to main content

Timeline for symmetric models and HOD

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 26, 2017 at 21:40 comment added Asaf Karagila The forcing which adds a generic bijection from $\omega$ to $A$ (with finite injections as conditions) restores the full Cohen extension. Or rather, there is a generic filter doing just that. It is indeed a homogeneous forcing.
Mar 26, 2017 at 21:39 comment added Asaf Karagila Well. I think that would be easy if you prove that every set in Cohen's model is definable from ordinals and parameters in $A$ there. This should be doable, since you can identify a minimal support within Cohen's model, (i.e. you can find, for each set, a finite sequence of reals which serve as its minimal support). You can also have a partial interpretation function, which will then serve as a definition, and the ordinal would give you the name (which lies in $L$). Again, this is all very long and very technical, but that's how things tend to be when working in specific models by hand.
Mar 26, 2017 at 21:36 comment added Vladimir Kanovei One of key things which I am interested to fix is to prove that every set $x\in\text{HOD}(A)$ is a member of $\text{OD}(A)$ inside $\text{HOD}(A)$. What if we extend $\text{HOD}(A)$ by a generic bijection $f:\omega$ onto $A$ (finite conditions)? This looks like a homogeneous forcing
Mar 26, 2017 at 19:53 comment added Asaf Karagila Well, Cohen's original forcing was based on his definition of forcing, which is now known as "weak forcing" (or is it "strong forcing"? I always forget), and things were a bit weirder there. As far as I know, it was Halpern and Levy who formalized the construction as $L(A)$.
Mar 26, 2017 at 19:22 comment added Vladimir Kanovei By the way you are right, Cohen's original technique, which is essentially $L(A)$, is perhaps most instrumental for major facts including the ultrafilter existence and all sets being HOD($A$).
Mar 26, 2017 at 15:41 comment added Asaf Karagila Yes, these things are often complicated. I'd be happy to help, feel free to drop me an email with some details if you're interested.
Mar 26, 2017 at 15:37 comment added Vladimir Kanovei Well, unfortunately it takes 6 or so pages in Jech, deeply contaminated with the boolean algebra stuff. Minimally I'd like to prove self-containedly that the symmetric version of the construction satisfies: all sets belong to HOD($A$). I need a really self-contained proof since I want to prove that this model $L(A)$, even after extending by another real $x$ (say random or Mathias($U$), to begin with) keeps the D-finiteness and the existence of a free ultrafilter. It needs an OD($A,x$) wellordering inside, so the same problem arizes in a much more difficult setting. But thank you for the help.
Mar 26, 2017 at 13:35 history edited Asaf Karagila CC BY-SA 3.0
added 309 characters in body
Mar 26, 2017 at 12:31 history answered Asaf Karagila CC BY-SA 3.0