Timeline for Numerology with Ramanujan's pi formula
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 19, 2019 at 1:57 | vote | accept | Tito Piezas III | ||
| Apr 4, 2017 at 15:39 | answer | added | Tito Piezas III | timeline score: 3 | |
| Mar 26, 2017 at 15:58 | comment | added | user78249 | Because the title said Numerology I thought you might be asking something about the Freemasons or something. | |
| Mar 26, 2017 at 3:15 | comment | added | Tito Piezas III | @T.Amdeberhan: I just found the general case. Kindly see below. | |
| Mar 26, 2017 at 3:15 | answer | added | Tito Piezas III | timeline score: 7 | |
| Mar 26, 2017 at 0:06 | comment | added | Tito Piezas III | @T.Amdeberhan: I have also checked $396^2+2$ as a denominator. However, $s_1(k)$ seem to involve rationals already. (Notice that the second term of $s_n(k)$ for $n>1$ start with $1,2,4,8,16$.) | |
| Mar 26, 2017 at 0:01 | history | edited | Tito Piezas III | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 39 characters in body
|
| Mar 25, 2017 at 18:10 | comment | added | T. Amdeberhan | I've re-indexed $s_n(k)$ to match the $396^2+2^n$ in the denominators, I hope this okay. Another reason is for me to ask: if we treat the very first formula of Ramanujan corresponding to $s_0(k)$ then what is the missing series that might be associated with $s_1(k)$? | |
| Mar 25, 2017 at 18:07 | history | edited | T. Amdeberhan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 17 characters in body
|
| Mar 25, 2017 at 15:19 | history | asked | Tito Piezas III | CC BY-SA 3.0 |