Timeline for Is the ability to define Haar measure the main (or only) reason to consider locally compact topological groups? [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2010 at 20:29 | history | edited | Charles Matthews | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
typo
|
| Jun 2, 2010 at 2:42 | comment | added | S. Carnahan♦ | Closed. Try phrasing your questions more tactfully, and with more context. See the "how to ask" page for tips. | |
| Jun 2, 2010 at 2:39 | history | closed |
Harry Gindi François G. Dorais Robin Chapman Gjergji Zaimi S. Carnahan♦ |
not a real question | |
| Jun 1, 2010 at 9:57 | answer | added | Benoît Kloeckner | timeline score: 0 | |
| May 31, 2010 at 18:58 | answer | added | Marty | timeline score: 6 | |
| May 31, 2010 at 10:32 | answer | added | Charles Matthews | timeline score: 2 | |
| May 31, 2010 at 10:29 | comment | added | Robin Chapman | A lot of examples of topological groups in the "real world" are locally compact, for instance Lie groups, groups of ideles and adeles etc. And Fourier analysis is a powerful technique for these; see Tate's thesis. Non-commutative analogues lead to the wonders of the Langlands programme etc. | |
| May 31, 2010 at 9:51 | history | asked | teil | CC BY-SA 2.5 |