Timeline for Homology $H_*(TOP, \mathbb{Z}_2)$ of the stable homeomorphism space
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2017 at 7:01 | vote | accept | user106191 | ||
| Mar 28, 2017 at 19:20 | history | edited | user51223 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 10 characters in body
|
| Mar 28, 2017 at 6:32 | history | edited | user51223 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 64 characters in body
|
| Mar 28, 2017 at 5:57 | history | edited | user51223 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1144 characters in body
|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 13:15 | comment | added | user106191 | Thanks. Yes this is exactly the question. I thought it would be easier stating it more generally, I'm sorry. The fact that $h(\kappa) = 0$ is shown in Lemma 4.3 of arxiv.org/abs/1504.06752v2, as H. Zare kindly pointed out to me (The more general Curtis conjecture is not known to be true). How do you think a factorization of $J$ will help? $\kappa$ is in $coker J$, so does not lift to $\pi_{14}O$... Do you think one might deduce something from Madsen's statement about $H_*(BSO)$ and $H_*(BSG)$? Thanks already! | |
| Mar 19, 2017 at 22:39 | history | edited | user51223 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 107 characters in body
|
| Mar 19, 2017 at 22:19 | history | edited | user51223 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 107 characters in body
|
| Mar 19, 2017 at 21:38 | history | edited | user51223 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 125 characters in body
|
| Mar 19, 2017 at 21:24 | history | edited | user51223 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 4 characters in body
|
| Mar 19, 2017 at 19:38 | history | answered | user51223 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |