Timeline for homology under exact functors
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 2017 at 13:22 | comment | added | Michael Albanese | Crossposted on MSE. | |
| Mar 18, 2017 at 9:43 | comment | added | luw | Since $F$ is contravariant, the $i$-th term in $X$ becomes the $-i$-th term in $FX$. | |
| Mar 18, 2017 at 8:15 | comment | added | HeinrichD | I don't understand the sign $-i$. | |
| Mar 18, 2017 at 5:59 | review | Close votes | |||
| Mar 18, 2017 at 18:00 | |||||
| Mar 18, 2017 at 5:35 | vote | accept | luw | ||
| Mar 18, 2017 at 5:34 | vote | accept | luw | ||
| Mar 18, 2017 at 5:35 | |||||
| Mar 18, 2017 at 3:52 | answer | added | Tom Goodwillie | timeline score: 4 | |
| Mar 18, 2017 at 3:27 | history | edited | luw | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 21 characters in body
|
| Mar 18, 2017 at 2:48 | comment | added | luw | I know that a contravariant functor is a covariant functor in the opposite category, but what is the relationship between the homology in the opposite category and the original homology? | |
| Mar 18, 2017 at 1:59 | review | First posts | |||
| Mar 18, 2017 at 3:28 | |||||
| Mar 18, 2017 at 1:57 | history | asked | luw | CC BY-SA 3.0 |