Skip to main content
8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jan 12, 2019 at 0:39 vote accept Tim Campion
Jan 12, 2019 at 0:29 answer added D.-C. Cisinski timeline score: 7
Mar 22, 2017 at 1:44 answer added David White timeline score: 3
Mar 16, 2017 at 1:37 comment added Tim Campion Interesting. Stanculescu somehow doesn't have to muck around with cylinder objects the way Cisinski and Olschok do. But in (3) I'm happy to assume more about the pseudo-generating set -- e.g. I'd be happy to assume that it forms what Cisinski calls a class of anodyne extensions with respect to some functorial cylinder.
Mar 15, 2017 at 9:52 comment added Philippe Gaucher Your setting is very closed to the setting of model categories with a prescribed class of fibrant objects like in tac.mta.ca/tac/volumes/29/23/29-23.pdf because your pseudo-generating set of trivial cofibrations determines the fibrant objects (you probably already know the reference but in case you don't, I give it).
Mar 15, 2017 at 4:23 comment added Tim Campion Good point -- and Cisinki's theory gives an explicit pseudo-generating set for the minimal model structure (as long as you have a generating set for the cofibrations = monomorphisms). It would certainly be surprising if this were always an actual generating set. So probably I should expect at most the other direction: that getting a handle on explicit generating acyclic cofibrations will often entail that one is working in a right proper model structure...
Mar 14, 2017 at 10:11 comment added Philippe Gaucher In Cisinski's homotopy theory of toposes, the minimal model structure is always right proper (Remark 4.9 of his paper). And I don't believe that Condition 3 holds (I am not sure actually, it's why I am writing this comment).
Mar 14, 2017 at 7:51 history asked Tim Campion CC BY-SA 3.0