Timeline for Upper shadow of a union-closed family
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oct 24, 2017 at 12:48 | history | edited | karpasi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Generalized question after original question answered in the afirmative.
|
Aug 7, 2017 at 12:09 | comment | added | karpasi | I suspect that if we omit the union-closedness condition, we can get something like $(1-O(1/n))2^n$, or maybe $(1-O(\log{n}/n))2^n$. | |
Aug 7, 2017 at 12:07 | answer | added | karpasi | timeline score: 4 | |
Apr 11, 2017 at 15:32 | comment | added | Ilya Bogdanov | A subfamily $\{\varnothing,\{1\},\{2,3\},\{2,4\},\{3,4\}\}$ of $2^{[4]}$ shows that the fact does not hold if we omit the union-closedness assumption. | |
Mar 14, 2017 at 1:04 | history | edited | karpasi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 156 characters in body
|
Mar 13, 2017 at 21:32 | comment | added | მამუკა ჯიბლაძე | Since you explain what does union-closed mean, I believe it would be natural to also explain what is upper shadow. | |
Mar 13, 2017 at 18:38 | comment | added | Emil Jeřábek |
Note that \cal does not take an argument; it is an old-style font declaration that remains in effect until the end of the current group. You really want to use \mathcal . See e.g. tex.stackexchange.com/a/84043 .
|
|
Mar 13, 2017 at 18:31 | history | edited | Emil Jeřábek | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
fix TeX
|
Mar 13, 2017 at 17:18 | history | asked | karpasi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |