Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:19 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://math.stackexchange.com/ with https://math.stackexchange.com/
Mar 21, 2017 at 17:06 answer added Arthur B timeline score: 6
Mar 12, 2017 at 0:23 comment added Anthony Quas My point is that it's unlikely (in my opinion) that there will be a useful characterization of finite entropy that isn't a trivial reformulation of the original criterion.
Mar 12, 2017 at 0:04 history edited Henry.L CC BY-SA 3.0
added 112 characters in body
Mar 12, 2017 at 0:01 comment added Henry.L @AnthonyQuas (1)Oh..yes I updated it.(2) Why is that natural to you?
Mar 11, 2017 at 23:57 comment added Anthony Quas (1) clearly you could have finite energy but unbounded support by putting a little bit of mass in a small number of places (e.g. if $f$ takes only values 0 and 1, but is not supported on a bounded interval). For (2), the characterization is likely to be that it has finite entropy if and only if it has finite entropy.
Mar 11, 2017 at 23:37 review Close votes
Mar 12, 2017 at 13:34
Mar 11, 2017 at 23:00 history asked Henry.L CC BY-SA 3.0