Timeline for Design measure, which cannot be factorized as a product of measures
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 7, 2017 at 17:33 | comment | added | Anthony Quas | I just noticed that you posted the exact same question at essentially the same time on math.stackexchange.com. You did the same thing with a previous question. Please don't do this. It leads to wasted effort. If in doubt, post to MSE first. After a few days, if there is no answer, you can post to MO, along with a note that its cross-posted. For reference, this question is probably closer to the MSE level. | |
Mar 7, 2017 at 17:28 | comment | added | Anthony Quas | By the way: a measure is a product measure if and only if the matrix has rank 1. This one has rank $m$. | |
Mar 7, 2017 at 14:19 | comment | added | Anthony Quas | One interesting way to do this is to set $\mu(x_i,y_i)=m$ for $i\le m$, $\mu(x_i,y_j)=0$ for $j\le m$ with $i\ne j$ , and $\mu(x_i,y_j)=1$ for $j>m$. | |
Mar 7, 2017 at 14:13 | comment | added | Anthony Quas | I think what you're asking for is a essentially a non-trivial coupling of the counting measure on $\mathcal X\times\mathcal Y$. This is usually done with probability measures, although it's not essential. If you write the entries as a matrix, you're asking that $\sum_j \mu(x_i,y_j)=n$ and $\sum_i \mu(x_i,y_j)=m$. There are lots of ways to do this: you're satisfying $n+m$ equations in $nm$ variables. | |
Mar 7, 2017 at 1:59 | answer | added | Bjørn Kjos-Hanssen | timeline score: 1 | |
Mar 7, 2017 at 1:37 | history | edited | aberdysh | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 31 characters in body
|
Mar 7, 2017 at 1:20 | history | asked | aberdysh | CC BY-SA 3.0 |