Timeline for In what sense do Jones' original subfactors come from quantum SU(2)
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
| Mar 5, 2017 at 18:12 | comment | added | Sebastien Palcoux | They are equivalent as fusion categories. You can see the reference that I have added to the answer. It is stated there but not explained in details (the references in this reference could help). Note that the notion of "affine" in this reference means that we consider "projective" representations. | |
| Mar 5, 2017 at 18:03 | history | edited | Sebastien Palcoux | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
addition of a reference
|
| Mar 5, 2017 at 10:34 | comment | added | hetairoi22 | Thanks for your answer! I was wondering if you could clarify something: In what sense are the two categories you mention equivalent? | |
| Mar 5, 2017 at 10:02 | history | answered | Sebastien Palcoux | CC BY-SA 3.0 |