Timeline for Is there a useful theory of D-modules on smooth (non-analytic) manifolds?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13 at 22:33 | vote | accept | ಠ_ಠ | ||
| S Aug 3 at 18:03 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
| S Aug 3 at 18:03 | history | notice removed | CommunityBot | ||
| Jul 29 at 10:47 | comment | added | coLaideronnette | See the introduction of arxiv.org/abs/1111.2087 | |
| Jul 28 at 21:39 | comment | added | Z. M | What is your definition of D-modules in this context? A natural definition would be, I guess, quasicoherent sheaves on the "smooth de Rham space". These quasicoherent sheaves should encode much more information than derivatives. | |
| Jul 28 at 20:15 | answer | added | Bazin | timeline score: 3 | |
| S Jul 26 at 16:19 | history | bounty started | Pulcinella | ||
| S Jul 26 at 16:19 | history | notice added | Pulcinella | Authoritative reference needed | |
| Mar 7, 2017 at 13:05 | comment | added | Paul Siegel | Well, one of the early results which generated a lot of interest in D-modules was Bernshtein's proof that a linear differential operator on $\mathbb{R}^n$ with constant coefficients has a fundamental solution. The argument has generalizations at least to certain kinds of operators and certain kinds of manifolds. math1.tau.ac.il/~bernstei/Publication_list/publication_texts/… | |
| Mar 7, 2017 at 10:03 | history | edited | ಠ_ಠ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 128 characters in body
|
| Mar 4, 2017 at 6:03 | history | edited | ಠ_ಠ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 3 characters in body
|
| Mar 4, 2017 at 5:58 | history | edited | ಠ_ಠ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 149 characters in body
|
| Mar 4, 2017 at 5:52 | history | edited | ಠ_ಠ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited tags
|
| Mar 3, 2017 at 8:39 | history | asked | ಠ_ಠ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |