Timeline for Converse on the rectifiability of products of rectifiable sets
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
3 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2017 at 20:32 | history | edited | Stefan Kohl♦ |
edited tags
|
|
| Mar 24, 2017 at 15:10 | comment | added | Silvia Ghinassi | Maybe I am looking at this the wrong way, but the difference in the two definitions is whether you allow "a few" corners or intersections of two Lipschitz images; I don't see why a statement of that kind would hold considering that we only look at things up to measure zero we can't conclude pointwise statements. I am not sure if you are familiar with rectifiability, but just FYI what people refer to as "$k$-rectifiability" nowadays is your definition (3) (Federer's terminology is not widely used anymore), see Wikipedia. | |
| Feb 23, 2017 at 14:53 | history | asked | Paul-Benjamin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |