Timeline for Numerical algorithm for extracting the coefficients of transseries
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2017 at 21:46 | comment | added | Fetchinson0234 | Yes, the domain is restricted to $x>0$, sorry, I should have made it clearer before. | |
| Mar 8, 2017 at 21:45 | history | edited | Fetchinson0234 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 12 characters in body
|
| Feb 24, 2017 at 16:09 | comment | added | user21349 | Maybe there's something I'm not understanding properly, but in the $J=0$ case, it seems to me that the value of $f$ is dominated by the $c$ terms for small positive $x$, and is dominated by the $d$ terms for small negative $x$. Doesn't this provide a straightforward way to isolate the $c$'s and $d$'s? Or are you restricting the domain to $x>0$? | |
| Feb 24, 2017 at 8:41 | history | edited | Fetchinson0234 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 100 characters in body
|
| Feb 23, 2017 at 15:02 | comment | added | Fetchinson0234 | Generally $n$ has an infinite range and $j$ has a finite range, actually only 1 set of exponentials would already be interesting. | |
| Feb 23, 2017 at 15:01 | history | edited | Fetchinson0234 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 129 characters in body
|
| Feb 23, 2017 at 14:10 | comment | added | Max Alekseyev | What are the ranges for $n$'s and $j$ in the summation? | |
| Feb 23, 2017 at 11:10 | history | edited | Fetchinson0234 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Feb 23, 2017 at 11:03 | history | asked | Fetchinson0234 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |