Timeline for What is the relation between the holonomy groupoid of a foliation and the corresponding Haefliger groupoid?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2019 at 14:50 | history | edited | Praphulla Koushik | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 6 characters in body
|
| Feb 24, 2017 at 16:52 | history | edited | Gael Meigniez | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 442 characters in body
|
| Feb 20, 2017 at 21:38 | comment | added | Jim Stasheff | Thanks to you both. I'm happy with the universal Haefliger classifying space B\Gamma_q but if `his foliation' means the one I asked about, I'd be happy with that also. | |
| Feb 19, 2017 at 20:14 | comment | added | Gael Meigniez | Thank you for the welcome; yes $\alpha=\beta$ means the same holonomy class. Reading Jim's question again, I'm not sure any more if he means the universal Haefliger classifying space B\Gamma_q, or the classifying space of the groupoid (or pseudo-group) of his foliation. | |
| Feb 19, 2017 at 20:05 | comment | added | Sebastian Goette | Welcome to math overflow. Try to use TeX whenever possible. Your description of the holonomy groupoid looks correct. At the end, when you say $\alpha=\beta$, you probably mean that the holonomy classes of these paths are equal? | |
| Feb 19, 2017 at 20:03 | history | edited | Sebastian Goette | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Introduced some tex
|
| Feb 19, 2017 at 20:01 | review | First posts | |||
| Feb 19, 2017 at 20:35 | |||||
| Feb 19, 2017 at 19:57 | history | answered | Gael Meigniez | CC BY-SA 3.0 |