Skip to main content

Timeline for Lifting line bundles

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 20, 2017 at 14:07 vote accept George
Feb 19, 2017 at 21:15 answer added inkspot timeline score: 5
Feb 19, 2017 at 20:45 comment added Jason Starr @t3suji. I did not see your comment, or I would have held off on mine.
Feb 19, 2017 at 20:44 comment added Jason Starr . . . So if $h^2(X,\mathcal{O}_X)$ is positive, then the obstruction to lifting modulo $p$, $p^2$, etc. might all vanish until we reach $p^d$. On the other hand, if $h^2(X,\mathcal{O}_X)$ equals $0$, then for every $d\geq 0$, for every ring homomorphism $W[[t_1,\dots,t_n]]\to W/p^dW$, this homomorphism lifts to $W[[t_1,\dots,t_n]]\to W$.
Feb 19, 2017 at 20:43 comment added t3suji Another way to say this: if you managed to lift $L$ modulo $p^n$, then the obstruction to lifting modulo $p^{n+1}$ lie in $H^2(X,O_X)$. Just because you know that the obstruction is zero on a particular step, you don't know whether it will vanish on the next. On the other hand, if $H^2(X,O_X)=0$, all of the obstructions vanish. (Sorry Jason, did not mean to interrupt --- I did not realize you were about to add more.)
Feb 19, 2017 at 20:38 comment added Jason Starr This is described very clearly in any reference on infinitesimal deformation theory, e.g., the beginning of Koll'ar's "Rational Curves on Algebraic Varieties", Mike Artin's TIFR book on "Deformations of Singularities", etc. Deeper are Illusie's books on the cotangent complex. The short answer is that the functor is pro-represented by a complete local ring $W[[t_1,\dots,t_n]]/\langle f_1,\dots,f_r \rangle$ where $n$ equals $h^1(X,\mathcal{O}_X)$ and $r$ equals $h^2(X,\mathcal{O}_X)$. If $r$ equals $1$, for instance, $f_1$ might be $p^d$.
Feb 19, 2017 at 20:06 comment added George @DonuArapura Right! I forgot that. I'm still a bit confused though. Why is it then that $L$ will lift if $\mathrm{H}^2(X,\mathcal{O}_X)=0$? Your comment seems to suggest that the vanishing of this $H^2$ a priori only implies the liftability mod $p$. Am I missing something?
Feb 19, 2017 at 19:58 comment added Donu Arapura There are separate obstructions for lifting mod $p^2$, $p^3$ etc. So even if you can do the first lift, you could get stuck at the $p^2$ step, where the obstruction space is only a $\mathbb{Z}/p^2$ module.
Feb 19, 2017 at 19:50 history edited George CC BY-SA 3.0
added 4 characters in body
Feb 19, 2017 at 19:27 history asked George CC BY-SA 3.0