Skip to main content
edited tags
Source Link
GH from MO
  • 105.3k
  • 8
  • 293
  • 398

Let $f(\tau) = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} a(n) q^n$ be a cusp form on $\Gamma_0(4N)$ of half-integer weight $k \ge 5/2.$ The Ramanujan-Petersson conjecture in this case is that $$a(n) \ll n^{(k-1)/2 + \varepsilon}$$ for any $\varepsilon > 0.$$\varepsilon > 0$. Unlike the integer-weight case, this is unresolved as far as I am aware.

I am interested to know what is currently the best bound on the growth of $a(n).$$a(n)$. The bound I am most familiar with is due to Iwaniec (Theorem 1 of this article) giving $a(n) \ll n^{k/2 - 2/7 +\varepsilon}$. But it seems that Conrey and Iwaniec proved a better bound of the form $a(n) \ll n^{k/2 - 1/3 + \varepsilon}$ here as Corollary 1.3 (it is unclear to me whether this holds generally)

Both of the articles I linked to are fairly old. I would be grateful if an expert could inform me about what has happened since then.

Let $f(\tau) = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} a(n) q^n$ be a cusp form on $\Gamma_0(4N)$ of half-integer weight $k \ge 5/2.$ The Ramanujan-Petersson conjecture in this case is that $$a(n) \ll n^{(k-1)/2 + \varepsilon}$$ for any $\varepsilon > 0.$ Unlike the integer-weight case, this is unresolved as far as I am aware.

I am interested to know what is currently the best bound on the growth of $a(n).$ The bound I am most familiar with is due to Iwaniec (Theorem 1 of this article) giving $a(n) \ll n^{k/2 - 2/7 +\varepsilon}$. But it seems that Conrey and Iwaniec proved a better bound of the form $a(n) \ll n^{k/2 - 1/3 + \varepsilon}$ here as Corollary 1.3 (it is unclear to me whether this holds generally)

Both of the articles I linked to are fairly old. I would be grateful if an expert could inform me about what has happened since then.

Let $f(\tau) = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} a(n) q^n$ be a cusp form on $\Gamma_0(4N)$ of half-integer weight $k \ge 5/2.$ The Ramanujan-Petersson conjecture in this case is that $$a(n) \ll n^{(k-1)/2 + \varepsilon}$$ for any $\varepsilon > 0$. Unlike the integer-weight case, this is unresolved as far as I am aware.

I am interested to know what is currently the best bound on the growth of $a(n)$. The bound I am most familiar with is due to Iwaniec (Theorem 1 of this article) giving $a(n) \ll n^{k/2 - 2/7 +\varepsilon}$. But it seems that Conrey and Iwaniec proved a better bound of the form $a(n) \ll n^{k/2 - 1/3 + \varepsilon}$ here as Corollary 1.3 (it is unclear to me whether this holds generally)

Both of the articles I linked to are fairly old. I would be grateful if an expert could inform me about what has happened since then.

edited tags
Source Link
GH from MO
  • 105.3k
  • 8
  • 293
  • 398

Let $f(\tau) = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} a(n) q^n$ be a cusp form on $\Gamma_0(4N)$ of half-integer weight $k \ge 5/2.$ The Ramanujan-Petersson conjecture in this case is that $$a(n) << n^{(k-1)/2 + \varepsilon}$$$$a(n) \ll n^{(k-1)/2 + \varepsilon}$$ for any $\varepsilon > 0.$ Unlike the integer-weight case, this is unresolved as far as I am aware.

I am interested to know what is currently the best bound on the growth of $a(n).$ The bound I am most familiar with is due to Iwaniec (Theorem 1 of this article) giving $a(n) << n^{k/2 - 2/7 +\varepsilon}$$a(n) \ll n^{k/2 - 2/7 +\varepsilon}$. But it seems that Conrey and Iwaniec proved a better bound of the form $a(n) << n^{k/2 - 1/3 + \varepsilon}$$a(n) \ll n^{k/2 - 1/3 + \varepsilon}$ here as Corollary 1.3 (it is unclear to me whether this holds generally)

Both of the articles I linked to are fairly old. I would be grateful if an expert could inform me about what has happened since then.

Let $f(\tau) = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} a(n) q^n$ be a cusp form on $\Gamma_0(4N)$ of half-integer weight $k \ge 5/2.$ The Ramanujan-Petersson conjecture in this case is that $$a(n) << n^{(k-1)/2 + \varepsilon}$$ for any $\varepsilon > 0.$ Unlike the integer-weight case, this is unresolved as far as I am aware.

I am interested to know what is currently the best bound on the growth of $a(n).$ The bound I am most familiar with is due to Iwaniec (Theorem 1 of this article) giving $a(n) << n^{k/2 - 2/7 +\varepsilon}$. But it seems that Conrey and Iwaniec proved a better bound of the form $a(n) << n^{k/2 - 1/3 + \varepsilon}$ here as Corollary 1.3 (it is unclear to me whether this holds generally)

Both of the articles I linked to are fairly old. I would be grateful if an expert could inform me about what has happened since then.

Let $f(\tau) = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} a(n) q^n$ be a cusp form on $\Gamma_0(4N)$ of half-integer weight $k \ge 5/2.$ The Ramanujan-Petersson conjecture in this case is that $$a(n) \ll n^{(k-1)/2 + \varepsilon}$$ for any $\varepsilon > 0.$ Unlike the integer-weight case, this is unresolved as far as I am aware.

I am interested to know what is currently the best bound on the growth of $a(n).$ The bound I am most familiar with is due to Iwaniec (Theorem 1 of this article) giving $a(n) \ll n^{k/2 - 2/7 +\varepsilon}$. But it seems that Conrey and Iwaniec proved a better bound of the form $a(n) \ll n^{k/2 - 1/3 + \varepsilon}$ here as Corollary 1.3 (it is unclear to me whether this holds generally)

Both of the articles I linked to are fairly old. I would be grateful if an expert could inform me about what has happened since then.

Source Link

Coefficient bounds on cusp forms, half-integer weight

Let $f(\tau) = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} a(n) q^n$ be a cusp form on $\Gamma_0(4N)$ of half-integer weight $k \ge 5/2.$ The Ramanujan-Petersson conjecture in this case is that $$a(n) << n^{(k-1)/2 + \varepsilon}$$ for any $\varepsilon > 0.$ Unlike the integer-weight case, this is unresolved as far as I am aware.

I am interested to know what is currently the best bound on the growth of $a(n).$ The bound I am most familiar with is due to Iwaniec (Theorem 1 of this article) giving $a(n) << n^{k/2 - 2/7 +\varepsilon}$. But it seems that Conrey and Iwaniec proved a better bound of the form $a(n) << n^{k/2 - 1/3 + \varepsilon}$ here as Corollary 1.3 (it is unclear to me whether this holds generally)

Both of the articles I linked to are fairly old. I would be grateful if an expert could inform me about what has happened since then.