Timeline for Real Adjoint representations of complex type
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2017 at 21:01 | vote | accept | Bilateral | ||
| Feb 18, 2017 at 20:52 | comment | added | Bilateral | Thanks for the comments. I was aware of the terminology, but I wanted to simplify the question so I just defined the complext type to mean both. I will edit it accordingly. | |
| Feb 18, 2017 at 20:49 | comment | added | Mikhail Borovoi | @nfdc23: Yes, I have noticed this, but he can learn the standard terminology form Serre's book or any other book. | |
| Feb 18, 2017 at 20:42 | comment | added | nfdc23 | The OP is using the terminology "complex type" with a meaning different from the usual one (he only asks that $\mathbf{C}$ occur inside the endomorphism algebra over $\mathbf{R}$, not that it coincides; i.e., quaternionic cases are also being called "complex type" by him). | |
| Feb 18, 2017 at 20:39 | history | answered | Mikhail Borovoi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |