Skip to main content
added 72 characters in body
Source Link

This is known to be Carlson's inequality from 1935 (for $t_k\geq 0$, and not all $t_k$ are $0$). The Swedish mathematician Fritz Carlson (1888-1952) also proved the optimality of the constant $\pi^2$. For an elegant elementary proof of the inequality see G. H. Hardy, A note on two inequalities, J. London Math. Soc. 11, 167-170, 1936 (DOI https://doi.org/10.1112/jlms/s1-11.3.167 or http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1112/jlms/s1-11.3.167/abstract).

Note: This inequality has found many modern day applications and generalizations, see the book "Multiplicative Inequalities of Carlson Type and Interpolation" by L. Larsson et al., World Scientific, 2006. (DOI https://doi.org/10.1142/6063; there you will find a free sample chapter with the classical proofs of Carlson and Hardy.)

This is known to be Carlson's inequality from 1935 (for $t_k\geq 0$, and not all $t_k$ are $0$). The Swedish mathematician Fritz Carlson (1888-1952) also proved the optimality of the constant $\pi^2$. For an elegant elementary proof of the inequality see G. H. Hardy, A note on two inequalities, J. London Math. Soc. 11, 167-170, 1936 (DOI https://doi.org/10.1112/jlms/s1-11.3.167).

Note: This inequality has found many modern day applications and generalizations, see the book "Multiplicative Inequalities of Carlson Type and Interpolation" by L. Larsson et al., World Scientific, 2006. (DOI https://doi.org/10.1142/6063; there you will find a free sample chapter with the classical proofs of Carlson and Hardy.)

This is known to be Carlson's inequality from 1935 (for $t_k\geq 0$, and not all $t_k$ are $0$). The Swedish mathematician Fritz Carlson (1888-1952) also proved the optimality of the constant $\pi^2$. For an elegant elementary proof of the inequality see G. H. Hardy, A note on two inequalities, J. London Math. Soc. 11, 167-170, 1936 (DOI https://doi.org/10.1112/jlms/s1-11.3.167 or http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1112/jlms/s1-11.3.167/abstract).

Note: This inequality has found many modern day applications and generalizations, see the book "Multiplicative Inequalities of Carlson Type and Interpolation" by L. Larsson et al., World Scientific, 2006. (DOI https://doi.org/10.1142/6063; there you will find a free sample chapter with the classical proofs of Carlson and Hardy.)

added some information on Fritz Carlson, clarified that optimality of the constant was already proved in his original paper.
Source Link

This is known to be Carlson's inequality from 1935 (for $t_k\geq 0$, and not all $t_k$ are $0$). The Swedish mathematician Fritz Carlson (1888-1952) also proved the optimality of the constant $\pi^2$ is indeed optimal,. For an elegant elementary proof of the inequality see G. H. Hardy, A note on two inequalities, J. London Math. Soc. 11, 167-170, 1936 (DOI https://doi.org/10.1112/jlms/s1-11.3.167).

NoteNote: This inequality has found many modern day applications and generalizations, see the book "Multiplicative Inequalities of Carlson Type and Interpolation" by L. Larsson et al., World Scientific, 2006. (DOI https://doi.org/10.1142/6063; there you will find a free sample chapter with the classical proofs of Carlson and Hardy.)

This is known to be Carlson's inequality from 1935 (for $t_k\geq 0$, and not all $t_k$ are $0$). The constant $\pi^2$ is indeed optimal, see G. H. Hardy, A note on two inequalities, J. London Math. Soc. 11, 167-170, 1936 (DOI https://doi.org/10.1112/jlms/s1-11.3.167).

Note: This inequality has found many modern day applications and generalizations, see the book "Multiplicative Inequalities of Carlson Type and Interpolation" by L. Larsson et al., World Scientific, 2006. (DOI https://doi.org/10.1142/6063; there you will find a free sample chapter with the classical proofs of Carlson and Hardy.)

This is known to be Carlson's inequality from 1935 (for $t_k\geq 0$, and not all $t_k$ are $0$). The Swedish mathematician Fritz Carlson (1888-1952) also proved the optimality of the constant $\pi^2$. For an elegant elementary proof of the inequality see G. H. Hardy, A note on two inequalities, J. London Math. Soc. 11, 167-170, 1936 (DOI https://doi.org/10.1112/jlms/s1-11.3.167).

Note: This inequality has found many modern day applications and generalizations, see the book "Multiplicative Inequalities of Carlson Type and Interpolation" by L. Larsson et al., World Scientific, 2006. (DOI https://doi.org/10.1142/6063; there you will find a free sample chapter with the classical proofs of Carlson and Hardy.)

added 334 characters in body
Source Link

This is known to be Carlson's inequality from 1935 (for $t_k\geq 0$, and not all $t_k$ are $0$). The constant $\pi^2$ is indeed optimal, see G. H. Hardy, A note on two inequalities, J. London Math. Soc. 11, 167-170, 1936 (DOI https://doi.org/10.1112/jlms/s1-11.3.167).

Note: This inequality has found many modern day applications and generalizations, see the book "Multiplicative Inequalities of Carlson Type and Interpolation" by L. Larsson et al., World Scientific, 2006. (DOI https://doi.org/10.1142/6063; there you will find a free sample chapter with the classical proofs of Carlson and Hardy.)

This is known to be Carlson's inequality from 1935 (for $t_k\geq 0$, and not all $t_k$ are $0$). The constant $\pi^2$ is indeed optimal, see G. H. Hardy, A note on two inequalities, J. London Math. Soc. 11, 167-170, 1936 (DOI https://doi.org/10.1112/jlms/s1-11.3.167).

This is known to be Carlson's inequality from 1935 (for $t_k\geq 0$, and not all $t_k$ are $0$). The constant $\pi^2$ is indeed optimal, see G. H. Hardy, A note on two inequalities, J. London Math. Soc. 11, 167-170, 1936 (DOI https://doi.org/10.1112/jlms/s1-11.3.167).

Note: This inequality has found many modern day applications and generalizations, see the book "Multiplicative Inequalities of Carlson Type and Interpolation" by L. Larsson et al., World Scientific, 2006. (DOI https://doi.org/10.1142/6063; there you will find a free sample chapter with the classical proofs of Carlson and Hardy.)

Source Link
Loading