Timeline for Is the "addition" of flat morphisms flat?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oct 14, 2017 at 21:02 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Sep 14, 2017 at 20:20 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Aug 15, 2017 at 20:12 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Jul 16, 2017 at 19:32 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Feb 7, 2017 at 0:55 | comment | added | Jason Starr | That is not true. For $X=Y=\text{Proj}\ k[u,v,w]$, for $F=\mathcal{O}_X^{\oplus 3}$, for $G=\mathcal{O}_X(1)$, for $\phi_1=(u,v,w)$, and for $\phi_2 = (-u,u-v,v-w)$, both $\phi_1$ and $\phi_2$ are surjective, but $\phi_1+\phi_2$ has image $\mathcal{I}\cdot G$, where $\mathcal{I}$ is the ideal sheaf of the closed point of the homogeneous prime ideal $\langle u,v\rangle$. | |
Feb 7, 2017 at 0:51 | answer | added | user104547 | timeline score: 1 | |
Feb 7, 2017 at 0:28 | history | asked | user43198 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |