Timeline for Unitary dual of the Heisenberg group over non-archimedean local fields of characteristic two
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feb 7, 2017 at 2:34 | history | edited | m07kl | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 119 characters in body
|
Feb 5, 2017 at 10:21 | comment | added | m07kl | @VictorProtsak: You are right. I guess the unitary dual has the same structure even for local fields of characteristic two. please see section 1.2 of V. Lafforgue's paper: "vlafforg.perso.math.cnrs.fr/haagerup-rem.pdf" for an evidence | |
Feb 5, 2017 at 10:18 | history | edited | m07kl | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 7 characters in body
|
Feb 5, 2017 at 2:59 | comment | added | Victor Protsak | Note that, strictly speaking, the unitary dual is not "the same as for [the] real Heiseberg group", because the central character is a unitary character of $k$, and so depends on the field. (Likewise, the unitary representations with trivial central character are one-dimensional, hence are parametrized by the Pontryagin dual of $k^2$, and so depend on $k$). Perhaps, you can say that, for appropriate fields $k$, the unitary dual has the same structure, namely, there is a unique irreducible complex unitary representation for any non-trivial unitary character of $k$. | |
Feb 5, 2017 at 1:48 | history | edited | m07kl |
edited tags
|
|
Feb 5, 2017 at 1:41 | history | asked | m07kl | CC BY-SA 3.0 |