Skip to main content
MathOverflow

Return to Question

Post Reopened by Mikhail Katz, Gro-Tsen, Daniele Tampieri, R.P., Yemon Choi
style
Source Link
Mikhail Katz
Mikhail Katz
  • 16.6k
  • 2
  • 54
  • 127

In a paper I'm working on, I'm tempted to write something like:

Note that the argument above also proves the following result:

Scholium. bla blaetc.

Is this ok? Is it correct to say that a "scholium" is a "corollary of a proof"?

In a paper I'm working on, I'm tempted to write something like:

Note that the argument above also proves the following result:

Scholium. bla bla

Is this ok? Is it correct to say that a "scholium" is a "corollary of a proof"?

In a paper I'm working on, I'm tempted to write something like:

Note that the argument above also proves the following result:

Scholium. etc.

Is this ok? Is it correct to say that a "scholium" is a "corollary of a proof"?

edited tags
Link
Mikhail Katz
Mikhail Katz
  • 16.6k
  • 2
  • 54
  • 127
Post Closed as "Not suitable for this site" by john mangual, Lucia, user1073, Alexey Ustinov, András Bátkai
Source Link
Jairo Bochi
Jairo Bochi
  • 2.5k
  • 18
  • 31

What is a "scholium"?

In a paper I'm working on, I'm tempted to write something like:

Note that the argument above also proves the following result:

Scholium. bla bla

Is this ok? Is it correct to say that a "scholium" is a "corollary of a proof"?