Timeline for Conjecture about harmonic numbers
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
23 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:19 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://math.stackexchange.com/ with https://math.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Feb 2, 2017 at 3:03 | review | Close votes | |||
| Feb 2, 2017 at 9:50 | |||||
| Jan 27, 2017 at 15:06 | history | edited | LRDPRDX | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| Jan 27, 2017 at 15:00 | history | edited | LRDPRDX | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 100 characters in body
|
| Jan 27, 2017 at 13:01 | comment | added | Gottfried Helms | Wolfgang, see more data for your plot in my last answer (at end) | |
| Jan 27, 2017 at 10:17 | answer | added | Gottfried Helms | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jan 26, 2017 at 6:35 | answer | added | Gerhard Paseman | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jan 25, 2017 at 20:30 | history | edited | LRDPRDX | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 228 characters in body
|
| Jan 25, 2017 at 20:23 | comment | added | LRDPRDX | There is a question (link in the discription) to prove that there exist infinitely many $n$ such that $$H_n - \lfloor H_n\rfloor < \frac{1}{n^2}.$$ So I wanted to find several $n$'s numerically, but I did not find any $n > 1$ which fulfilled that inequality. Also, see pictures I added in the description. | |
| Jan 25, 2017 at 20:18 | comment | added | BigM | Interesting question. May I ask the motivation ( or the context)? | |
| Jan 25, 2017 at 20:01 | comment | added | LRDPRDX | Yes. It denotes cardinality, | |
| Jan 25, 2017 at 19:44 | comment | added | Pietro Majer | Does $|M|$ denote cardinality? | |
| Jan 25, 2017 at 19:38 | comment | added | Fedor Petrov | why close? It looks interesting | |
| Jan 25, 2017 at 19:35 | history | edited | LRDPRDX | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 82 characters in body
|
| Jan 25, 2017 at 19:01 | comment | added | LRDPRDX | I got it, Like a tag question. | |
| Jan 25, 2017 at 17:56 | comment | added | YCor | "isn't" is standard English, a rhetorical negation. "Isn't it clear" means more or less "It's clear, or I miss something?" | |
| Jan 25, 2017 at 17:44 | history | edited | LRDPRDX | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 68 characters in body
|
| Jan 25, 2017 at 17:44 | comment | added | LRDPRDX | I agree that $\bar\eta$ is decreasing. But I do not understand the ''isn't'' in the beginning. | |
| Jan 25, 2017 at 17:19 | comment | added | user2520938 | isn't the fact that $\eta$ is decreasing clear since for $\epsilon_1<\epsilon_2$ $$0\leq H_n - \lfloor{H_n\rfloor} < \frac{1}{n^{1+\epsilon_2}}<\frac{1}{n^{1+\epsilon_1}}$$ | |
| Jan 25, 2017 at 17:15 | review | Close votes | |||
| Jan 25, 2017 at 20:57 | |||||
| Jan 25, 2017 at 16:44 | history | edited | LRDPRDX | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| Jan 25, 2017 at 16:39 | review | First posts | |||
| Jan 25, 2017 at 16:56 | |||||
| Jan 25, 2017 at 16:37 | history | asked | LRDPRDX | CC BY-SA 3.0 |