Skip to main content

Timeline for A criterion for purity

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 15, 2019 at 12:02 comment added Earthliŋ This is a cross-post of math.stackexchange.com/q/2099967/33855
Jan 24, 2017 at 10:59 vote accept Anoop singh
Feb 20, 2017 at 11:51
Jan 24, 2017 at 10:59 vote accept Anoop singh
Jan 24, 2017 at 10:59
Jan 23, 2017 at 5:19 comment added Anoop singh @JasonStarr ,@Mohan How do we relate torsion free sheaf and pure sheaf? Pure sheaf implies torsion free sheaf. What is the proof of this statement?
S Jan 21, 2017 at 7:26 history suggested Martin Sleziak CC BY-SA 3.0
added Google Books link
Jan 21, 2017 at 6:18 review Suggested edits
S Jan 21, 2017 at 7:26
S Jan 21, 2017 at 4:17 history suggested Konstantinos Kanakoglou CC BY-SA 3.0
tex delimiters added and improvement in format
Jan 21, 2017 at 3:53 review Suggested edits
S Jan 21, 2017 at 4:17
Jan 20, 2017 at 11:17 comment added Mohan For (1), assume that all associated primes of $E$ have the same dimension $d$, then $\dim E=d$. If $0\neq F\subset E$, then on the one hand, we have $\dim F\leq d$. But the associated primes of $F$ are also associated primes of $E$ and thus we have $\dim F\geq d$.
Jan 20, 2017 at 10:39 comment added Anoop singh @JasonStarr The definition for pure is as follows: $E $ is pure of dimension d if $dim(F) = d$ for all non-trivial coherent subsheaves $F \subset E$
Jan 20, 2017 at 8:52 comment added Jason Starr I thought that was the definition of "pure". What is the definition of pure in Huybrechts and Lehn? Also, please be advised that there is at least one other definition of pure in local commutative algebra: the definition that is used in SGA 2.
Jan 20, 2017 at 5:44 review First posts
Jan 20, 2017 at 5:46
Jan 20, 2017 at 5:41 history asked Anoop singh CC BY-SA 3.0