Timeline for When the automorphism group of an object determines the object
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 2020 at 7:27 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Jan 16, 2017 at 22:45 | comment | added | Francesco Polizzi | @YCor: yes, I was thinking about this. Probably the assumption "abelian" for some reason was tacitly assumed in the statement I read, and unfortunately I still do not have access to the original papers. | |
| Jan 16, 2017 at 21:53 | comment | added | YCor | @FrancescoPolizzi $End(G)$ is usually not a ring when $G$ is not abelian. | |
| Jan 16, 2017 at 18:41 | comment | added | Francesco Polizzi | Yes, I know :-) Regarding the groups: well, the statement of the Baer-Kaplanski theorem in the reference that I posted does not say "abelian", but other references actually seem to require this assumption. Let us say "abelian" for the moment, I will try to look at the original reference by Baer or Kaplanski. | |
| Jan 16, 2017 at 18:04 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by Todd Trimble | ||
| Jan 16, 2017 at 15:44 | comment | added | Benjamin Steinberg | The first item is about endos not autos. Are the groups abelian? | |
| Jan 16, 2017 at 14:04 | history | edited | Francesco Polizzi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 90 characters in body
|
| Jan 16, 2017 at 13:55 | history | answered | Francesco Polizzi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |