Skip to main content
13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jan 29, 2017 at 19:17 answer added anonymous timeline score: 0
S Jan 15, 2017 at 12:38 history suggested Martin Sleziak CC BY-SA 3.0
added doi link and link to arxiv version
Jan 15, 2017 at 12:23 review Suggested edits
S Jan 15, 2017 at 12:38
Jan 15, 2017 at 12:01 comment added Todd Trimble On the Cyrillic spelling that had been in the title, see the meta discussion here: meta.mathoverflow.net/questions/3104/…
Jan 15, 2017 at 11:53 history edited Todd Trimble CC BY-SA 3.0
changed the title in response to a meta discussion
Jan 14, 2017 at 15:56 vote accept anonymous
Jan 14, 2017 at 15:22 answer added Hannes timeline score: 5
Jan 14, 2017 at 14:32 history edited anonymous CC BY-SA 3.0
Clarify what $p^*$ is. Fix constraints on exponents/dimensions.
Jan 14, 2017 at 14:26 comment added anonymous @Hannes You're right. Thanks for being thorough!
Jan 14, 2017 at 14:19 comment added Hannes Also, adding to my previous comment: I think one should expect $W^{s,p}(\Omega) \hookrightarrow W^{s-\epsilon,q}(\Omega)$ compactly for $q \in [1,p^*(n,\epsilon))$ since you spend only $\epsilon$ of differentiability - assuming that was not what you asked for.
Jan 14, 2017 at 14:15 comment added Hannes I suggest to add that $p^* = p^*(n,s) = \frac{np}{n-sp}$. I am aware that the paper also just writes $p^*$ but at least in my world $p^*$ is usually the Sobolev conjugate corresponding to $s=1$.
Jan 14, 2017 at 11:39 history edited anonymous CC BY-SA 3.0
The L2-Laplacian representation requires a factor
Jan 14, 2017 at 11:00 history asked anonymous CC BY-SA 3.0