Timeline for Is the $L^p$ space of tensors complete?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:19 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://math.stackexchange.com/ with https://math.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 13, 2017 at 13:42 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Feb 11, 2017 at 13:14 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Jan 12, 2017 at 14:00 | comment | added | Ryan Unger | @WillSawin Maybe nothing fails. I thought surely one couldn't use monotone/dominated convergence, but perhaps I didn't understand the proof for $L^p$ as well as I should. I have to carefully check this now. | |
| Jan 12, 2017 at 13:11 | comment | added | Will Sawin | Does any step of the standard proof that $L^p$ is complete fail here? | |
| Jan 12, 2017 at 12:58 | answer | added | clyde | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 12, 2017 at 12:44 | review | First posts | |||
| Jan 12, 2017 at 12:50 | |||||
| Jan 12, 2017 at 12:39 | history | asked | Ryan Unger | CC BY-SA 3.0 |