Skip to main content
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
Source Link

Motivated by this postby this post we give the following definition:

Definition: A pair of unital rings $(R,S)$ is called a consecutive pair of rings if they do not have non trivial idempotent and satisfy the following two conditions:

1)There is a surjective morphism $\phi:R\to S$.

2)If a unital ring $W$ without non trivial idempotent possess a surjective sequence of morphisms $R\to W \to S$ then either $W\simeq R$ or $W \simeq S$.

Let $C([0,1])$ be the ring of all complex continuous functions.

Is the pair $(C([0,1]), \mathbb{C})$ a consecutive pair of rings?

Motivated by this post we give the following definition:

Definition: A pair of unital rings $(R,S)$ is called a consecutive pair of rings if they do not have non trivial idempotent and satisfy the following two conditions:

1)There is a surjective morphism $\phi:R\to S$.

2)If a unital ring $W$ without non trivial idempotent possess a surjective sequence of morphisms $R\to W \to S$ then either $W\simeq R$ or $W \simeq S$.

Let $C([0,1])$ be the ring of all complex continuous functions.

Is the pair $(C([0,1]), \mathbb{C})$ a consecutive pair of rings?

Motivated by this post we give the following definition:

Definition: A pair of unital rings $(R,S)$ is called a consecutive pair of rings if they do not have non trivial idempotent and satisfy the following two conditions:

1)There is a surjective morphism $\phi:R\to S$.

2)If a unital ring $W$ without non trivial idempotent possess a surjective sequence of morphisms $R\to W \to S$ then either $W\simeq R$ or $W \simeq S$.

Let $C([0,1])$ be the ring of all complex continuous functions.

Is the pair $(C([0,1]), \mathbb{C})$ a consecutive pair of rings?

edited tags
Link
YCor
  • 63.9k
  • 5
  • 187
  • 286
added 27 characters in body
Source Link
Ali Taghavi
  • 366
  • 8
  • 31
  • 123

Is the pair $(C([0 1]\;1]),\mathbb{C})$ a consecutive pair?

Motivated by this post we give the following definition:

Definition: A pair of unital rings $(R,S)$ is called a consecutive pair of rings if they do not have non trivial idempotent and satisfy the following two conditions:

1)There is a surjective morphism $\phi:R\to S$.

2)For aIf a unital ring $W$ which is neither isomorphic to $R$ nor to $S$, there is no awithout non trivial idempotent possess a surjective sequence of morphisms $R\to W \to S$ then either $W\simeq R$ or $W \simeq S$.

Let $C([0,1])$ be the ring of all complex continuous functions.

Is the pair $(C([0,1]), \mathbb{C})$ a consecutive pair of rings?

Is the pair $(C([0 1]),\mathbb{C})$ a consecutive pair?

Motivated by this post we give the following definition:

Definition: A pair of unital rings $(R,S)$ is called a consecutive pair of rings if they do not have non trivial idempotent and satisfy the following two conditions:

1)There is a surjective morphism $\phi:R\to S$.

2)For a ring $W$ which is neither isomorphic to $R$ nor to $S$, there is no a surjective sequence of morphisms $R\to W \to S$.

Let $C([0,1])$ be the ring of all complex continuous functions.

Is the pair $(C([0,1]), \mathbb{C})$ a consecutive pair of rings?

Is the pair $(C([0 \;1]),\mathbb{C})$ a consecutive pair?

Motivated by this post we give the following definition:

Definition: A pair of unital rings $(R,S)$ is called a consecutive pair of rings if they do not have non trivial idempotent and satisfy the following two conditions:

1)There is a surjective morphism $\phi:R\to S$.

2)If a unital ring $W$ without non trivial idempotent possess a surjective sequence of morphisms $R\to W \to S$ then either $W\simeq R$ or $W \simeq S$.

Let $C([0,1])$ be the ring of all complex continuous functions.

Is the pair $(C([0,1]), \mathbb{C})$ a consecutive pair of rings?

Source Link
Ali Taghavi
  • 366
  • 8
  • 31
  • 123
Loading