Skip to main content
4 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
Jan 9, 2017 at 18:52 comment added Will Sawin There is a lower bound by norms: There are at most $n$ conjugates of this sum, each of size at most $\log n$, and the product of the conjugates is a nonzero integer, hence at least $1$, so the number is at least $1/(\log n)^n = e^(-n \log \log n)$. Of course this is quite far from the upper bound and conjectural lower bound that Vesselin Dimitrov gave.
Jan 9, 2017 at 18:27 comment added Vesselin Dimitrov A pigeonholing argument shows it can be as small as exponential in $-(\log{n})^2$. It should be bounded below at least by $e^{-o(n)}$ as $n \to \infty$, but already this is an unsolved problem, even for sums of five $n$-th roots of unity. Non-trivial upper bound can be proved for the number of extremely small sums.
Jan 9, 2017 at 17:32 history asked kodlu CC BY-SA 3.0