Timeline for Random Walks in $Z^2$/$Z^2$-intrinsic characterization of Euclidean distance Part II
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Feb 27, 2018 at 0:35 | history | suggested | J.J. Green | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
improved (I hope) displayed mathematics
|
| Feb 26, 2018 at 20:09 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Feb 27, 2018 at 0:35 | |||||
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
| May 26, 2010 at 6:53 | comment | added | Pietro Majer | Just a remark to recall that your p<sub>n</sub>(j,k) is the coefficient of x<sup>j</sup> y<sup>k</sup> in the expansion of (x + 1/x + 1 + y + 1/y )<sup>n</sup>. | |
| May 26, 2010 at 1:03 | vote | accept | Yakov Shlapentokh-Rothman | ||
| May 26, 2010 at 1:02 | history | edited | Yakov Shlapentokh-Rothman | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 335 characters in body
|
| May 26, 2010 at 0:56 | answer | added | George Lowther | timeline score: 8 | |
| May 26, 2010 at 0:49 | history | edited | Yakov Shlapentokh-Rothman | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 147 characters in body
|
| May 26, 2010 at 0:30 | comment | added | Yakov Shlapentokh-Rothman | That is a very good point! I will try to modify the question. | |
| May 25, 2010 at 23:25 | comment | added | George Lowther | What you are suggesting implies that the probability of being at (3,4) is the same as being at (5,0) for all large n. That seems unlikely, and would guess that $C_n=5$ for n large. | |
| May 25, 2010 at 22:41 | answer | added | Tom LaGatta | timeline score: 8 | |
| May 25, 2010 at 22:25 | answer | added | Robby McKilliam | timeline score: 7 | |
| May 25, 2010 at 18:06 | history | asked | Yakov Shlapentokh-Rothman | CC BY-SA 2.5 |