Skip to main content
Added name to list.
Source Link
HJRW
  • 25k
  • 3
  • 68
  • 144

Let $G_1 \subset G_2 \subset \dots$ be a sequence of groups and inclusion homomorphisms. It satisfies homological stability if for every $r \in \mathbb{N}_0$ there is an $n(r)$, such that for all $n > n(r)$ the homomorphism $$ H_r(G_n) \to H_r(G_{n+1}) $$ induced by the inclusion is an isomorphism. Examples of groups that have homological stability are the symmetric groups $S_n$, the braid groups $B_n$ and the automorphism group of the free groups $Aut(F_n)$.

Harer proved that the mapping class groups $\Gamma_{g,b}$ of surfaces $\Sigma_{g,b}$ of genus $g$ with $b$ boundary components given by $$ \Gamma_{g,b} = \pi_0(Diff^+(\Sigma_{g,b}, \partial \Sigma_{g,b})) $$ satisfy homological stability in the sense that the homomorphisms of the homology groups obtained from gluing on various surfaces along the boundary components eventually become isomorphisms. For example, gluing on a pair of pants for $b \geq 1$ gives a homomorphism $$ \Gamma_{g,b} \to \Gamma_{g,b+1} $$ which induces an isomorphism in homology $H_r(\Gamma_{g,b}) \to H_r(\Gamma_{g,b+1})$ in the range $r > 1$, $g \geq 3r-2$.

These results were later generalised by Madsen, Weiss, Galatius, Randal-Williams, Hatcher, Vogtmann, Wahl and many others. It has influenced the way to think about cobordism categories and has revealed a lot about the structure of moduli spaces of surfaces (possibly with tangential structures).

This answer is much too short to give a huge and fruitful subject the attention it deserves. But maybe some of the people working in this area (some of which are active on mathoverflow) can expand on it.

Let $G_1 \subset G_2 \subset \dots$ be a sequence of groups and inclusion homomorphisms. It satisfies homological stability if for every $r \in \mathbb{N}_0$ there is an $n(r)$, such that for all $n > n(r)$ the homomorphism $$ H_r(G_n) \to H_r(G_{n+1}) $$ induced by the inclusion is an isomorphism. Examples of groups that have homological stability are the symmetric groups $S_n$, the braid groups $B_n$ and the automorphism group of the free groups $Aut(F_n)$.

Harer proved that the mapping class groups $\Gamma_{g,b}$ of surfaces $\Sigma_{g,b}$ of genus $g$ with $b$ boundary components given by $$ \Gamma_{g,b} = \pi_0(Diff^+(\Sigma_{g,b}, \partial \Sigma_{g,b})) $$ satisfy homological stability in the sense that the homomorphisms of the homology groups obtained from gluing on various surfaces along the boundary components eventually become isomorphisms. For example, gluing on a pair of pants for $b \geq 1$ gives a homomorphism $$ \Gamma_{g,b} \to \Gamma_{g,b+1} $$ which induces an isomorphism in homology $H_r(\Gamma_{g,b}) \to H_r(\Gamma_{g,b+1})$ in the range $r > 1$, $g \geq 3r-2$.

These results were later generalised by Madsen, Weiss, Galatius, Randal-Williams, Hatcher, Wahl and many others. It has influenced the way to think about cobordism categories and has revealed a lot about the structure of moduli spaces of surfaces (possibly with tangential structures).

This answer is much too short to give a huge and fruitful subject the attention it deserves. But maybe some of the people working in this area (some of which are active on mathoverflow) can expand on it.

Let $G_1 \subset G_2 \subset \dots$ be a sequence of groups and inclusion homomorphisms. It satisfies homological stability if for every $r \in \mathbb{N}_0$ there is an $n(r)$, such that for all $n > n(r)$ the homomorphism $$ H_r(G_n) \to H_r(G_{n+1}) $$ induced by the inclusion is an isomorphism. Examples of groups that have homological stability are the symmetric groups $S_n$, the braid groups $B_n$ and the automorphism group of the free groups $Aut(F_n)$.

Harer proved that the mapping class groups $\Gamma_{g,b}$ of surfaces $\Sigma_{g,b}$ of genus $g$ with $b$ boundary components given by $$ \Gamma_{g,b} = \pi_0(Diff^+(\Sigma_{g,b}, \partial \Sigma_{g,b})) $$ satisfy homological stability in the sense that the homomorphisms of the homology groups obtained from gluing on various surfaces along the boundary components eventually become isomorphisms. For example, gluing on a pair of pants for $b \geq 1$ gives a homomorphism $$ \Gamma_{g,b} \to \Gamma_{g,b+1} $$ which induces an isomorphism in homology $H_r(\Gamma_{g,b}) \to H_r(\Gamma_{g,b+1})$ in the range $r > 1$, $g \geq 3r-2$.

These results were later generalised by Madsen, Weiss, Galatius, Randal-Williams, Hatcher, Vogtmann, Wahl and many others. It has influenced the way to think about cobordism categories and has revealed a lot about the structure of moduli spaces of surfaces (possibly with tangential structures).

This answer is much too short to give a huge and fruitful subject the attention it deserves. But maybe some of the people working in this area (some of which are active on mathoverflow) can expand on it.

Post Made Community Wiki by Todd Trimble
Source Link
Ulrich Pennig
  • 7.6k
  • 1
  • 27
  • 65

Let $G_1 \subset G_2 \subset \dots$ be a sequence of groups and inclusion homomorphisms. It satisfies homological stability if for every $r \in \mathbb{N}_0$ there is an $n(r)$, such that for all $n > n(r)$ the homomorphism $$ H_r(G_n) \to H_r(G_{n+1}) $$ induced by the inclusion is an isomorphism. Examples of groups that have homological stability are the symmetric groups $S_n$, the braid groups $B_n$ and the automorphism group of the free groups $Aut(F_n)$.

Harer proved that the mapping class groups $\Gamma_{g,b}$ of surfaces $\Sigma_{g,b}$ of genus $g$ with $b$ boundary components given by $$ \Gamma_{g,b} = \pi_0(Diff^+(\Sigma_{g,b}, \partial \Sigma_{g,b})) $$ satisfy homological stability in the sense that the homomorphisms of the homology groups obtained from gluing on various surfaces along the boundary components eventually become isomorphisms. For example, gluing on a pair of pants for $b \geq 1$ gives a homomorphism $$ \Gamma_{g,b} \to \Gamma_{g,b+1} $$ which induces an isomorphism in homology $H_r(\Gamma_{g,b}) \to H_r(\Gamma_{g,b+1})$ in the range $r > 1$, $g \geq 3r-2$.

These results were later generalised by Madsen, Weiss, Galatius, Randal-Williams, Hatcher, Wahl and many others. It has influenced the way to think about cobordism categories and has revealed a lot about the structure of moduli spaces of surfaces (possibly with tangential structures).

This answer is much too short to give a huge and fruitful subject the attention it deserves. But maybe some of the people working in this area (some of which are active on mathoverflow) can expand on it.