Timeline for are endomorphisms "small" compared to the full transformations?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2023 at 15:15 | history | edited | T. Amdeberhan | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 9 characters in body
|
| Apr 7, 2019 at 4:01 | vote | accept | T. Amdeberhan | ||
| Jan 5, 2017 at 15:58 | comment | added | Jan-Christoph Schlage-Puchta | I noticed that when computing the maximum in the second to last line I left out the factor $e$, which lead to the value 1.33, which is too small. The new value should be correct ,and is still small enough. Note that the upper bound $e^{(1-c)n}$ for some $c>0$ follows from the bound $r^k/k!\leq e^r$ again. | |
| Jan 5, 2017 at 15:51 | history | edited | Jan-Christoph Schlage-Puchta | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Corrected an error in the calculation
|
| Jan 4, 2017 at 17:40 | history | answered | Jan-Christoph Schlage-Puchta | CC BY-SA 3.0 |