Timeline for Automorphisms of the hyperreals over the rationals and nontrivial automorphism groups
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 31, 2016 at 22:51 | history | edited | Joel David Hamkins | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 49 characters in body
|
Dec 31, 2016 at 21:03 | comment | added | Joel David Hamkins | Correction: I should have said finitely-generated subfield; of course, it is countably infinite. | |
Dec 31, 2016 at 19:14 | comment | added | Todd Trimble | Oh sure; thanks. I rather prefer that formulation. | |
Dec 31, 2016 at 19:12 | comment | added | Joel David Hamkins | One could argue like this: that theory (the elementary diagram of $F$ plus the assertion that $\pi$ is a nontrivial automorphism) is consistent, because every finite part of the theory is consistent, since any finite subtheory makes reference to only finitely many particular elements of $F$, which generate a finite subfield, and then reduce to the computable saturation argument in the countable case. So, no forcing. I think almost any model theory book will prove the existence of sufficiently homogeneous models, and that is what I'm doing. | |
Dec 31, 2016 at 18:49 | comment | added | Todd Trimble | Is it possible to rewrite your penultimate paragraph so as to make no reference to forcing extensions, but instead appeal to pure model theory? | |
Dec 31, 2016 at 13:22 | history | edited | Joel David Hamkins | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 135 characters in body
|
Dec 31, 2016 at 13:09 | history | answered | Joel David Hamkins | CC BY-SA 3.0 |