Timeline for Using iterative projection to solve a minimization problem
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
25 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 2:33 | comment | added | Nolan | @RodrigodeAzevedo Hi, could you help me with another question on the website mathoverflow.net/questions/266998/… | |
| Apr 1, 2017 at 9:08 | comment | added | Federico Poloni | Small remark that is probably not relevant: if $C$ is invertible, this problem suddenly becomes a lot simpler... | |
| Apr 1, 2017 at 4:45 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Mar 2, 2017 at 10:01 | review | Close votes | |||
| Mar 2, 2017 at 12:30 | |||||
| Mar 2, 2017 at 4:44 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Jan 31, 2017 at 4:19 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| S Jan 1, 2017 at 3:48 | history | suggested | Rodrigo de Azevedo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
The OP wrote a misleading title. This has nothing to do with Kullback Leibler
|
| Jan 1, 2017 at 2:41 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jan 1, 2017 at 3:48 | |||||
| Dec 31, 2016 at 15:36 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| Dec 31, 2016 at 16:12 | |||||
| S Dec 31, 2016 at 15:28 | history | suggested | Rodrigo de Azevedo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Clarified the question based on information provided by the OP in the comments
|
| Dec 31, 2016 at 15:26 | answer | added | Rodrigo de Azevedo | timeline score: 1 | |
| Dec 31, 2016 at 15:11 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Dec 31, 2016 at 15:28 | |||||
| Dec 31, 2016 at 15:08 | comment | added | Nolan | Sorry, I have changed it. Constraint 3 means that each term in the matrix is in the value of 1. | |
| Dec 31, 2016 at 15:07 | history | edited | Nolan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| Dec 31, 2016 at 15:06 | comment | added | Nolan | l1-norm or frobenius norm are both OK for my problem. | |
| Dec 31, 2016 at 15:04 | history | edited | Nolan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 192 characters in body
|
| Dec 31, 2016 at 14:59 | comment | added | Nolan | @RodrigodeAzevedo KL divergence in matrix can be just replaced by norm($Γ-Γ_1$) | |
| S Dec 31, 2016 at 10:47 | history | edited | Dima Pasechnik | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
minor edits
|
| S Dec 31, 2016 at 10:47 | history | suggested | Rodrigo de Azevedo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
minor edits
|
| Dec 31, 2016 at 10:34 | comment | added | Rodrigo de Azevedo | How is the KL divergence defined when the inputs are matrices, rather than distributions? | |
| Dec 31, 2016 at 10:34 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Dec 31, 2016 at 10:47 | |||||
| Dec 31, 2016 at 9:20 | history | edited | Nolan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| Dec 31, 2016 at 8:37 | history | edited | Nolan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
| Dec 29, 2016 at 8:50 | review | First posts | |||
| Dec 29, 2016 at 9:08 | |||||
| Dec 29, 2016 at 8:41 | history | asked | Nolan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |