Timeline for Solution for Moment problem
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 2016 at 21:14 | comment | added | LuHell | The expressions appear in this question [mathoverflow.net/questions/258232/… | |
| Dec 29, 2016 at 21:13 | comment | added | LuHell | Yes that is the support. I normalized to [-1,1], however the expressions just don't simplify. | |
| Dec 29, 2016 at 21:06 | comment | added | Pietro Majer | what is the interval where the measure is supported? is it the above $[-\omega,\omega]$? (a good starting point would be to get rid of some constants, and renormalize e.g. in $[-1,1]$ ) | |
| Dec 29, 2016 at 19:25 | comment | added | LuHell | Thanks @PietroMajer. I put the reduced problem with a recurrence below. | |
| Dec 29, 2016 at 19:24 | answer | added | LuHell | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 29, 2016 at 19:03 | comment | added | Pietro Majer | Try to deduce an equation for $f$ from the recurrence; if you add it I'll see. | |
| Dec 29, 2016 at 18:30 | comment | added | LuHell | @PietroMajer The recurrence is nonlinear. Any suggestions on how to proceed? | |
| Dec 28, 2016 at 17:49 | comment | added | Pietro Majer | Any linear recurrence for the moments may also be of use | |
| Dec 28, 2016 at 17:26 | comment | added | T. Amdeberhan | Step 1: see if you can find some "closed form" for the moments. Step 2: hope to apply mathoverflow.net/questions/79868/… | |
| Dec 28, 2016 at 17:03 | history | edited | LuHell | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Dec 28, 2016 at 16:06 | history | asked | LuHell | CC BY-SA 3.0 |