Timeline for Why is $C_k(\omega_1)$ Lindelöf?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
| S Jan 14, 2017 at 10:00 | history | suggested | Martin Sleziak | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added link
|
| Jan 14, 2017 at 9:44 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jan 14, 2017 at 10:00 | |||||
| Jan 2, 2017 at 8:07 | vote | accept | Tom | ||
| Dec 29, 2016 at 7:20 | comment | added | Taras Banakh | The proof of a more general fact can be found in Corollary 5.35 of the survey paper [S.P.Gulʹko, Semilattice of retractions and the properties of continuous function spaces of partial maps. Recent progress in function spaces, 93--155, Quad. Mat., 3, Dept. Math., Seconda Univ. Napoli, Caserta, 1998.] | |
| Dec 27, 2016 at 17:12 | comment | added | Taras Banakh | The book [R.McCoy, I.Ntantu, Topological properties of spaces of continuous functions, Springer, 1988] on page 69 contains an exercise 4a) related to the Lindelof property of the function spaces $C_k(X,R)$ and refers to two papers of Gul'ko published in Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR in 1977,1978. As a rule, papers in Doklady only announced results without detail proofs. Unfortunately, Russian internet sources like math-ru do not show this journal. | |
| Dec 27, 2016 at 14:42 | answer | added | Taras Banakh | timeline score: 4 | |
| Dec 24, 2016 at 10:57 | answer | added | Taras Banakh | timeline score: 5 | |
| Dec 22, 2016 at 14:01 | history | edited | Francesco Polizzi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 25 characters in body
|
| Dec 22, 2016 at 13:47 | history | asked | Tom | CC BY-SA 3.0 |