Timeline for About reflections of reflection groups
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 23, 2016 at 18:25 | comment | added | Sam Hopkins | This homework solution sheet seems to provide such an argument: math.sfsu.edu/federico/Clase/Coxeter/HomeworkSolutions/9.pdf | |
Dec 23, 2016 at 18:21 | comment | added | Sam Hopkins | And by the way, I think it requires at least a small argument to show that every reflection has a reduced word that is a palindrome. | |
Dec 23, 2016 at 18:20 | comment | added | Sam Hopkins | In the theory of abstract Coxeter groups, "reflections" are usually defined to be the elements in the set $\{wsw^{-1}\colon w \in W, s\in S\}$ (where $(W,S)$ is some Coxeter system). Thus, reflections across codimension $>1$ subspaces are not usually called reflections in this context. | |
Dec 23, 2016 at 14:18 | vote | accept | bing | ||
Dec 23, 2016 at 14:16 | vote | accept | bing | ||
Dec 23, 2016 at 14:17 | |||||
Dec 21, 2016 at 16:35 | comment | added | Steven Stadnicki | A specific example (in $\mathbb{R}^3$) of an element of determinant $-1$ that's not a reflection is the composition of a reflection in the $xy$ plane with a rotation of $\frac{2\pi}n$ about the $z$ axis - think of it as a sort of rotary 'glide-reflection'; it'll have order $n$ if $n$ is even, or order $2n$ if $n$ is odd. | |
Dec 21, 2016 at 14:52 | history | answered | Bugs Bunny | CC BY-SA 3.0 |