Timeline for Why should the tensor product of $\mathcal{D}_X$-modules over $\mathcal{O}_X$ be a $\mathcal{D}_X$-module?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2018 at 16:03 | comment | added | David Ben-Zvi | @SaalHardali Your question is answered (with an unsurprisingly analogous answer) in Moerdijk, I.; Mrčun, J. On the universal enveloping algebra of a Lie algebroid. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 138 (2010), no. 9, 3135–3145. | |
| May 22, 2017 at 17:23 | comment | added | Saal Hardali | This is a little progress but it is still desirable to have an independent characterization of what kind of algebras (perhaps with extra structure) over a ring come from lie-reinhart pairs. Just as we know that a hopf algebra in char 0 is the enveloping algebra of some finite dimensional lie algebra iff it is a finitely primitively generated. | |
| Dec 25, 2016 at 10:18 | vote | accept | Saal Hardali | ||
| Dec 25, 2016 at 10:19 | |||||
| Dec 21, 2016 at 14:19 | history | answered | Simon Wadsley | CC BY-SA 3.0 |