Timeline for Seeking Noetherian normal domain with vanishing Picard group but not a UFD
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2010 at 13:09 | comment | added | Pete L. Clark | @Georges -- the article in question is an expanded version of math.uga.edu/~pete/factorization.pdf I should have a new draft available in the same place within a week. | |
| May 24, 2010 at 11:57 | history | edited | Georges Elencwajg | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added an "r" to correspondence
|
| May 24, 2010 at 11:46 | comment | added | Georges Elencwajg | Dear Pete, your nervosity is absolutely justified: Hartshorne demands that $char.k\neq2$ and Matsumura that 2 be invertible in the factorial ring. By the way, I'm pleased to learn that you are writing a new article on factorization: do you have a previsional date of uploading, so that I can look for it on your homepage? | |
| May 24, 2010 at 10:51 | comment | added | Pete L. Clark | P.S.: Can the characteristic of $k$ be $2$? I get nervous... | |
| May 24, 2010 at 10:49 | comment | added | Pete L. Clark | Thanks, Georges. As you can see from my comment above, I was thinking along these lines as well. I am indeed interested in the simplest way to present this very nice example. I'll think more about it and get back to you. | |
| May 24, 2010 at 10:44 | history | answered | Georges Elencwajg | CC BY-SA 2.5 |