Skip to main content
added references
Source Link
John Rognes
  • 9.3k
  • 45
  • 52

For the relation $Sq(U) = w.U$$Sq(U) = \Phi(w)$, where $Sq$ is the total Steenrod squaring operation, $U$ is the Thom class, $\Phi$ is the Thom isomorphism and $w$ is the total Stiefel-Whitney class, I would cite Rene Thom's 1951 thesis, published as "Espaces fibres en spheres et carres de Steenrod" in Ann. Sci. Ecole Norm. Sup. (3) 69 (1952). In the introduction he explains that he found the results for manifolds embedded in Euclidean space, and that Henri Cartan then showed him how to obtain the general case. These results were first announced by Thom in two Comptes Rendus Acad. Sc. notes (t. 230, 1950, p. 427 and p. 507). Wen-Tsun Wu's formula $Sq(v)=w$ in the case of the tangent bundle of a closed manifold is not the same result. It was announced in the same volume of Comptes Rendus (p. 508 and p. 918). Its proof depends on the results of Thom.

For the relation $Sq(U) = w.U$ I would cite Rene Thom's 1951 thesis, published as "Espaces fibres en spheres et carres de Steenrod" in Ann. Sci. Ecole Norm. Sup. (3) 69 (1952). Wu's formula $Sq(v)=w$ is not the same result.

For the relation $Sq(U) = \Phi(w)$, where $Sq$ is the total Steenrod squaring operation, $U$ is the Thom class, $\Phi$ is the Thom isomorphism and $w$ is the total Stiefel-Whitney class, I would cite Rene Thom's 1951 thesis, published as "Espaces fibres en spheres et carres de Steenrod" in Ann. Sci. Ecole Norm. Sup. (3) 69 (1952). In the introduction he explains that he found the results for manifolds embedded in Euclidean space, and that Henri Cartan then showed him how to obtain the general case. These results were first announced by Thom in two Comptes Rendus Acad. Sc. notes (t. 230, 1950, p. 427 and p. 507). Wen-Tsun Wu's formula $Sq(v)=w$ in the case of the tangent bundle of a closed manifold is not the same result. It was announced in the same volume of Comptes Rendus (p. 508 and p. 918). Its proof depends on the results of Thom.

added 188 characters in body
Source Link
John Rognes
  • 9.3k
  • 45
  • 52

Rene Thom (1952)For the relation ............$Sq(U) = w.U$ I would cite Rene Thom's 1951 thesis, published as "Espaces fibres en spheres et carres de Steenrod" in Ann. Sci. Ecole Norm. Sup. (3) 69 (1952). Wu's formula $Sq(v)=w$ is not the same result.

Rene Thom (1952) ..................

For the relation $Sq(U) = w.U$ I would cite Rene Thom's 1951 thesis, published as "Espaces fibres en spheres et carres de Steenrod" in Ann. Sci. Ecole Norm. Sup. (3) 69 (1952). Wu's formula $Sq(v)=w$ is not the same result.

Source Link
John Rognes
  • 9.3k
  • 45
  • 52

Rene Thom (1952) ..................