Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Sep 24, 2021 at 6:06 history edited Terry Tao CC BY-SA 4.0
added 207 characters in body
Sep 23, 2021 at 8:37 history edited Martin Sleziak CC BY-SA 4.0
capitalization
Jun 3, 2011 at 22:24 comment added Mikola I don't think finite element analysts (and I've worked with quite a few) care anything at all about either ring theory/modern algebra. Also, while it is technically true that the Fourier transform is a product of representation theory, at the level which it is used in signal processing this perspective is not commonly taken. In fact, JPEG uses the discrete cosine transform to approximate images, not the Fourier transform/convolution theorem, and so it is probably better understood using a functional analysis perspective.
Feb 25, 2011 at 14:52 comment added darij grinberg Why is SVD in "rings and algebras"?
Feb 25, 2011 at 6:04 comment added Zen Harper I think Fourier analysis / transforms / linear algebra / Finite Element Method don't really fit so well in Rings and Algebras (although, obviously, you can put them there if you really insist) - obviously they use algebraic techniques, but their main core is elsewhere (analysis, numerical analysis, etc.) in my opinion.
Feb 11, 2010 at 10:57 history edited kakaz CC BY-SA 2.5
added 83 characters in body; added 13 characters in body
Oct 26, 2009 at 17:37 history edited Alon Amit CC BY-SA 2.5
added 180 characters in body
Oct 26, 2009 at 17:15 history edited Terry Tao CC BY-SA 2.5
added 20 characters in body
Oct 26, 2009 at 15:58 history edited Kim Morrison CC BY-SA 2.5
added 155 characters in body
Oct 26, 2009 at 15:32 history edited Anton Geraschenko CC BY-SA 2.5
migrated application from Bongwizard
Oct 26, 2009 at 6:01 history answered Kim Morrison CC BY-SA 2.5