Skip to main content
I am planning on separating my question into two questions.
Source Link

Intuition behind results in Mumford's "Lectures on curves on an algebraic surface", I

These are some questions concerning Mumford's "Lectures on curves on an algebraic surface".

We concern ourselves with questions of the Picard variety $P$, and its dimension, of a complete nonsingular surface $F$ over an algebraically closed ground field $k$ of arbitrary characteristic. Let $\mathfrak{o}$ be the sheaf of local rings on $F$, $\{C_\alpha: \alpha \in S\}$ a family of curves on $F$ such that $C_0 = C$ is nonsingular and $N$ the sheaf of sections of the normal bundle to $C$ on $F$. Then the equality (A): $\dim P = h^1(\mathfrak{o})$ is equivalent to (B): $\{\text{Tangent space to }S \text{ at }\alpha = 0\} \overset{\rho}{\to} H^0(N)$ is surjective for suitable $\{C_\alpha : \alpha \in S\}$.

I was wondering if someone could give me their explanation/intuitions behind the following, as I am finding the book to be quite terse.

  1. The algebraic solution of problem (B) for characteristic $0$, following Kodaira-Spencer.
  2. The algebraic solution of problem (A) for characteristic $0$, following Grothendieck, using a theorem of Cartier on an algebraic group scheme.
  3. Problem (A) in characteristic $p$, i.e. $\dim P$ may not be given in general by $h^1(\mathfrak{o})$ but that the tangent space to $P$ (at a point) corresponds to the subspace of $H^1(\mathfrak{o})$ annihilated by the Bockstein operators.

Thanks in advance!

Intuition behind results in Mumford's "Lectures on curves on an algebraic surface"

These are some questions concerning Mumford's "Lectures on curves on an algebraic surface".

We concern ourselves with questions of the Picard variety $P$, and its dimension, of a complete nonsingular surface $F$ over an algebraically closed ground field $k$ of arbitrary characteristic. Let $\mathfrak{o}$ be the sheaf of local rings on $F$, $\{C_\alpha: \alpha \in S\}$ a family of curves on $F$ such that $C_0 = C$ is nonsingular and $N$ the sheaf of sections of the normal bundle to $C$ on $F$. Then the equality (A): $\dim P = h^1(\mathfrak{o})$ is equivalent to (B): $\{\text{Tangent space to }S \text{ at }\alpha = 0\} \overset{\rho}{\to} H^0(N)$ is surjective for suitable $\{C_\alpha : \alpha \in S\}$.

I was wondering if someone could give me their explanation/intuitions behind the following, as I am finding the book to be quite terse.

  1. The algebraic solution of problem (B) for characteristic $0$, following Kodaira-Spencer.
  2. The algebraic solution of problem (A) for characteristic $0$, following Grothendieck, using a theorem of Cartier on an algebraic group scheme.
  3. Problem (A) in characteristic $p$, i.e. $\dim P$ may not be given in general by $h^1(\mathfrak{o})$ but that the tangent space to $P$ (at a point) corresponds to the subspace of $H^1(\mathfrak{o})$ annihilated by the Bockstein operators.

Thanks in advance!

Intuition behind results in Mumford's "Lectures on curves on an algebraic surface", I

These are some questions concerning Mumford's "Lectures on curves on an algebraic surface".

We concern ourselves with questions of the Picard variety $P$, and its dimension, of a complete nonsingular surface $F$ over an algebraically closed ground field $k$ of arbitrary characteristic. Let $\mathfrak{o}$ be the sheaf of local rings on $F$, $\{C_\alpha: \alpha \in S\}$ a family of curves on $F$ such that $C_0 = C$ is nonsingular and $N$ the sheaf of sections of the normal bundle to $C$ on $F$. Then the equality (A): $\dim P = h^1(\mathfrak{o})$ is equivalent to (B): $\{\text{Tangent space to }S \text{ at }\alpha = 0\} \overset{\rho}{\to} H^0(N)$ is surjective for suitable $\{C_\alpha : \alpha \in S\}$.

I was wondering if someone could give me their explanation/intuitions behind the following, as I am finding the book to be quite terse.

  1. The algebraic solution of problem (A) for characteristic $0$, following Grothendieck, using a theorem of Cartier on an algebraic group scheme.
  2. Problem (A) in characteristic $p$, i.e. $\dim P$ may not be given in general by $h^1(\mathfrak{o})$ but that the tangent space to $P$ (at a point) corresponds to the subspace of $H^1(\mathfrak{o})$ annihilated by the Bockstein operators.

Thanks in advance!

Source Link
user97565
user97565

Intuition behind results in Mumford's "Lectures on curves on an algebraic surface"

These are some questions concerning Mumford's "Lectures on curves on an algebraic surface".

We concern ourselves with questions of the Picard variety $P$, and its dimension, of a complete nonsingular surface $F$ over an algebraically closed ground field $k$ of arbitrary characteristic. Let $\mathfrak{o}$ be the sheaf of local rings on $F$, $\{C_\alpha: \alpha \in S\}$ a family of curves on $F$ such that $C_0 = C$ is nonsingular and $N$ the sheaf of sections of the normal bundle to $C$ on $F$. Then the equality (A): $\dim P = h^1(\mathfrak{o})$ is equivalent to (B): $\{\text{Tangent space to }S \text{ at }\alpha = 0\} \overset{\rho}{\to} H^0(N)$ is surjective for suitable $\{C_\alpha : \alpha \in S\}$.

I was wondering if someone could give me their explanation/intuitions behind the following, as I am finding the book to be quite terse.

  1. The algebraic solution of problem (B) for characteristic $0$, following Kodaira-Spencer.
  2. The algebraic solution of problem (A) for characteristic $0$, following Grothendieck, using a theorem of Cartier on an algebraic group scheme.
  3. Problem (A) in characteristic $p$, i.e. $\dim P$ may not be given in general by $h^1(\mathfrak{o})$ but that the tangent space to $P$ (at a point) corresponds to the subspace of $H^1(\mathfrak{o})$ annihilated by the Bockstein operators.

Thanks in advance!