Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:19 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://math.stackexchange.com/ with https://math.stackexchange.com/
Dec 22, 2016 at 10:44 vote accept Asaf Shachar
Dec 14, 2016 at 16:12 comment added Asaf Shachar @IgorRivin These length-preserving maps need not be metric isometries, take for instance $\alpha(t)=(\cos t,\sin t)$. Also, even when they are injective isometries, they are not always surjective ($(x \to (x,0)$).
Dec 14, 2016 at 15:19 comment added Igor Rivin @RyanBudney I might be dense, but since $d(f(x), f(y)) = d(x, y),$ how can an isometry fail to be bijective?
Dec 14, 2016 at 8:07 answer added Asaf Shachar timeline score: 2
Dec 14, 2016 at 7:19 comment added Ryan Budney @IgorRivin: Asaf's definition of isometry allows for maps to be not bijections -- he allows covering spaces, for example. It also allows for isometric embeddings. He's trying to make a calculus-ish argument that the domain's dimension needs to be less than or equal the target space's.
Dec 14, 2016 at 4:29 answer added Anton Petrunin timeline score: 5
Dec 14, 2016 at 1:21 comment added Igor Rivin Doesn't this follow from the fact that an isometry is a homeomorphism?
Dec 13, 2016 at 22:41 history edited Asaf Shachar CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 3 characters in body
Dec 13, 2016 at 22:35 comment added Ryan Budney Any metric-defined notion of dimension would work. For example Lebesgue covering dimension is defined for metric spaces. It behaves as expected for manifolds and metric isometries of this sort give you a lower bound on the dimension of the target. So it's an immediate contradiction. All the results you need are in Munkres's point-set topology textbook, for example.
Dec 13, 2016 at 22:27 history asked Asaf Shachar CC BY-SA 3.0