Timeline for How to find Suleimanova's work on the Nonnegative Inverse Eigenvalue Problem?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
20 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2017 at 22:00 | answer | added | Pietro Paparella | timeline score: 5 | |
| Dec 13, 2016 at 12:14 | answer | added | Neil Strickland | timeline score: 6 | |
| Dec 13, 2016 at 9:24 | answer | added | Misha | timeline score: 10 | |
| Dec 13, 2016 at 7:35 | comment | added | Anthony Quas | Three things: 1) Some of the Russian journals were translated at some times. I'm not sure about that one at that time; 2) if this is a standard fact in your field, it is quite likely that some textbook will have include a proof of Suleimanova's theorem; 3) Some of the Russian journals from that era were just for statements of results, with proofs to be found elsewhere. The fact that the paper in question is a 3 page paper suggests that this is the case here. | |
| Dec 13, 2016 at 6:56 | comment | added | Rodrigo de Azevedo | Related: mathoverflow.net/q/175988/91764 and mathoverflow.net/q/23998/91764 | |
| Dec 13, 2016 at 6:47 | comment | added | Jeremy Lin | The translation option sounds so feasible that I believe it would have been done by now, @RodrigodeAzevedo. Especially since the paper is cited so often. Anyway, thanks so much for your time and help. Have a great night :) | |
| Dec 13, 2016 at 6:45 | comment | added | Jeremy Lin | Ah, I see @RodrigodeAzevedo. That is weird. So everyone who wrote papers that cite his work is just blindly accepting that the results were indeed proved by Suleimanova. Is this a pretty common practice? I'm new to research, so I definitely find this to be a bit strange. | |
| Dec 13, 2016 at 6:39 | comment | added | Rodrigo de Azevedo | Found nothing on mathnet.ru I guess the only option left is to find a dusty paper copy of it in some library and pay someone to translate it to English. I do not think those citing the paper in recent years have read it. They cite it because others have cited it. | |
| Dec 13, 2016 at 6:34 | comment | added | Jeremy Lin | Also, thanks for the edits to refer Suleimanova as female, @RodrigodeAzevedo. | |
| Dec 13, 2016 at 6:32 | comment | added | Jeremy Lin | Right @RodrigodeAzevedo. How should I proceed with finding this paper in English? Many, many papers (in English) have cited this work by Suleimanova -- are people just blindly citing the work without actually even reading it? | |
| Dec 13, 2016 at 6:30 | comment | added | Rodrigo de Azevedo | The reference in Russian is Сулейманова X., Стохастические матрицы с вещественными собственными значениями, Докл. АН СССР. 1949. - V. 66.-Р. 343-345. | |
| S Dec 13, 2016 at 6:30 | history | suggested | Rodrigo de Azevedo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
minor edits
|
| Dec 13, 2016 at 6:29 | comment | added | Jeremy Lin | Also this citation @RodrigodeAzevedo K. R. Suleimanova, “Stochastic Matrices with Real Eigenvalues,” Soviet Mathematics Doklady, Vol. 66, 1949, pp. 343-345. ... which I believe would be in Russian. | |
| Dec 13, 2016 at 6:25 | comment | added | Jeremy Lin | Specifically, a paper I just looked through cites it as: [13] H. R. Sule˘ımanova. Stochastic matrices with real characteristic numbers. Doklady Akad. Nauk SSSR (N.S.), 66:343–345, 1949. @RodrigodeAzevedo. | |
| Dec 13, 2016 at 6:23 | comment | added | Jeremy Lin | Yes, @RodrigodeAzevedo :) Did you find it? | |
| Dec 13, 2016 at 6:16 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Dec 13, 2016 at 6:30 | |||||
| Dec 13, 2016 at 6:15 | comment | added | Rodrigo de Azevedo | Are you referring to Suleimanova's "Stochastic matrices with real eigenvalues" (1949)? | |
| Dec 13, 2016 at 6:14 | comment | added | Anthony Quas | If the name ends in "ova" then it's a she. | |
| Dec 13, 2016 at 4:18 | review | First posts | |||
| Dec 13, 2016 at 5:01 | |||||
| Dec 13, 2016 at 4:17 | history | asked | Jeremy Lin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |