Timeline for Reaching Hecke eigenvalues from a trace formula
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 19, 2016 at 23:43 | history | edited | paul garrett | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
Dec 9, 2016 at 19:27 | vote | accept | Desiderius Severus | ||
Dec 9, 2016 at 16:56 | answer | added | Kimball | timeline score: 9 | |
Dec 9, 2016 at 11:32 | comment | added | GH from MO | The "conductor of Iwaniec-Sarnak" is not called the conductor, but the analytic conductor. At any rate, thanks for clarifying the question. | |
Dec 9, 2016 at 11:15 | comment | added | Desiderius Severus | @GHfromMO I just edited my post: the $\pi$'s are representations of the group of units of a totally definite quaternion algebra (so compact modulo the center), and the $c(\pi)$ is the usual notion of conductor of Iwaniec-Sarnak, lifted from $GL_2$ to $B^\times$. | |
Dec 9, 2016 at 11:14 | history | edited | Desiderius Severus | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Precision on which kind of automorphic representations
|
Dec 9, 2016 at 11:12 | comment | added | GH from MO | Please be more specific. What kind of $\pi$'s are you looking at? There are many (reductive algebraic) groups, and many kinds of automorphic representations. Also, clarify what exactly you mean by $c(\pi)$. | |
Dec 9, 2016 at 11:10 | history | edited | GH from MO |
edited tags
|
|
Dec 9, 2016 at 10:52 | history | asked | Desiderius Severus | CC BY-SA 3.0 |