Timeline for A "Completion" of $ZFC^-$
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
Dec 12, 2016 at 18:49 | vote | accept | Danielle Ulrich | ||
Dec 12, 2016 at 15:21 | answer | added | Emil Jeřábek | timeline score: 4 | |
Dec 11, 2016 at 21:49 | comment | added | Danielle Ulrich | Also, $T_1$ is equivalent to adding a truth predicate $\Gamma$, and then saying $\{\alpha: (\mathbb{V}_\alpha, \in) \preceq (\mathbb{V}, \in)\}$ is stationary for $\in$-definable classes. | |
Dec 11, 2016 at 21:45 | comment | added | Danielle Ulrich | Unsurpisingly, one gets into trouble if you have $T_1$ say that for all $\alpha \in P$, $(\mathbb{V}_\alpha, \in, P) \preceq (\mathbb{V}, \in, P)$. While this theory does make sense, it is in fact inconsistent (it defines truth). | |
Dec 11, 2016 at 21:43 | history | edited | Danielle Ulrich | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
clarifications to what $T_1$ is
|
Dec 9, 2016 at 18:09 | comment | added | Danielle Ulrich | Incidentally there is a lot of redundancy in $T_1$; for instance if we replaced $ZFC^-$ by $KP$ (Kripke-Platek set theory) we would get the same theory. | |
Dec 9, 2016 at 17:34 | history | edited | Danielle Ulrich | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added questions 3 and 4
|
Dec 9, 2016 at 17:27 | answer | added | Danielle Ulrich | timeline score: 1 | |
Dec 9, 2016 at 5:33 | history | asked | Danielle Ulrich | CC BY-SA 3.0 |