Timeline for When do we genuinely need Noetherian conditions?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 9, 2016 at 19:05 | comment | added | Ben Morley | Dear @nfdc23, Thank you for the advice - I will admit I have been avoiding EGA IV through fear, but perhaps it is time to brave it. | |
| Dec 9, 2016 at 0:08 | answer | added | Georges Elencwajg | timeline score: 26 | |
| Dec 8, 2016 at 20:56 | comment | added | nfdc23 | This is best learned by experience with techniques of argument than by seeking an all-purpose general "slogan"; i.e., one really should look under the hood at the engine. It is akin to the fact that technique is far more important than general theorems in the study of PDE. The methods are developed and used in a masterful way in EGA, so poke around in there to learn. Read EGA I and II (skip the final section 8 there), then section 8 of IV$_4$, and then explore. | |
| Dec 8, 2016 at 16:24 | answer | added | Beren Sanders | timeline score: 6 | |
| Dec 8, 2016 at 14:14 | history | asked | Ben Morley | CC BY-SA 3.0 |