Timeline for Is there a notion of hyperbolicity for number rings?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
| Jan 15, 2017 at 18:56 | vote | accept | Matthias Wendt | ||
| Dec 10, 2016 at 19:10 | comment | added | David Lampert | Do we ask that an extension (cover) of a hyperbolic number ring should be hyperbolic? | |
| Dec 8, 2016 at 11:11 | answer | added | Will Sawin | timeline score: 6 | |
| Dec 8, 2016 at 10:51 | comment | added | Jason Starr | There is an analogy between number fields and 3-manifolds proposed by Barry Mazur where primes in the ring of integers correspond to prime knots, cf. math.harvard.edu/~mazur/papers/alexander_polynomial.pdf The field of rational numbers is supposed to correspond to the 3-sphere. So presumably the field of rational numbers is not hyperbolic. | |
| Dec 8, 2016 at 10:46 | history | asked | Matthias Wendt | CC BY-SA 3.0 |