Timeline for Geometric implications of $\beta(B_X) = 2$
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 2016 at 21:40 | comment | added | Bill Johnson | Well, $\beta = 2$ clearly does not imply reflexivity. Reform $\ell_2$ with the maximum of the $\ell_2$ norm and $\max_{j\not= k} |x(j)|+|x(k)|$ to make the unit vector basis elements a distance $2$ apart. | |
| Dec 7, 2016 at 20:45 | comment | added | anonymous | As much as that's an interesting paper and I'm thankful for the reference: I don't think this answers any of my questions. | |
| Dec 7, 2016 at 19:50 | comment | added | Bill Johnson | Tomek, look at $\sum \ell_1^n)_p$ as $p\to \infty$. | |
| Dec 7, 2016 at 15:32 | history | answered | Bill Johnson | CC BY-SA 3.0 |