Skip to main content
8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 10, 2013 at 11:47 comment added john mangual I wonder how the choice of fundamental domain alters the discussion of elliptic curves
May 23, 2010 at 20:09 comment added Qiaochu Yuan The point of Harald's comment is that there is no 'canonical' fundamental domain, at least until you provide extra data.
May 23, 2010 at 14:21 answer added S. Carnahan timeline score: 2
May 23, 2010 at 13:55 comment added graveolensa Harald -- the crux of my question is whether any functions exist whose 'canonical' fundamental domain is a Gosper island -- if you were to look at domain colored pictures of these hypothetical functions, one would say "aha, Gosper islands" instead of "aha, period parallelograms".
May 23, 2010 at 12:02 history edited Wadim Zudilin
edited tags
May 23, 2010 at 11:56 comment added Harald Hanche-Olsen I don't think the question makes sense. An elliptic function has a period lattice $\Omega$, which is a subgroup of $\mathbb{C}$. There is nothing unique about “the” period parallellogram, though; it is just a convenient labeling of the equivalence classes $\mathbb{C}/\Omega$ by taking one element from each equivalence class. There is no reason, apart from convenience, why it has to be a parallellogram. Gosper islands should do just fine, though to go and pick a fractal one seems slightly perverse.
May 23, 2010 at 11:54 comment added Wadim Zudilin Dear Deoxy, your source for learning elliptic functions is definitely not the best one. But already there it's explained that fundamental domains of elliptic functions are parallelograms (quotients of $\mathbb C$ by lattices), no snowflakes. More exotic fundamental domains can be constructed for automorphic rather than elliptic functions. I wonder whether one can get fractals but tiling pictures of more regular geometric structure can be seen for example in M.Yoshida's "Hypergeometric functions, my love" (1997).
May 23, 2010 at 11:28 history asked graveolensa CC BY-SA 2.5